SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 2

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Madapuram Maddileti Naidu – Appellant
Versus
The State of A.P., – Respondent


COMMON ORDER :

All the three transfer criminal petitions are filed by the respective accused out of about 47 accused in the Sessions Case No.63 of 2009 pending at the stage of arguments, which is covered by Crime No.37 of 2008 of S.H.O, Devarakonda Police Station, Kurnool District, State of Andhra Pradesh, for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 324, 326, 307, 302 read with 149 I.P.C and Sections 3, 4 and 6 of Explosive Substances Act, Sections 25(1)(b) and 27 of the Indian Arms Act, for which offences, the accused were charged for trial.

2) The transfer Criminal Petition No.180 of 2014 was filed on 04.08.2014 by the 1st accused M.M.Naidu to transfer the Sessions Case from the Court of II Additional District Judge at Adoni, Kurnool District, where it is pending to any other competent Court of Sessions, Kurnool Sessions Division. Along with the transfer application, the affidavit filed by the petitioner speaks from para No.4 that the approach of the learned Presiding Officer in adjudicating the trial and guilt of the offence is completely biased and is being conducted in pro- prosecution manner. The Petitioner is presumed to be innocent till guilt is proved. Accused has s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top