SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
M/s Gayatri Agencies – Appellant
Versus
Poduri Subba Lakshmi , Radha Subba Lakshmi – Respondent


ORDER:

1 This revision is filed under Section 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the order dated 05.11.2014 passed in Crl.M.P.No.2405 of 2014 in C.C.No.174 of 2014 on the file of IV Additional Judicial Magistrate of I Class, Kakinada.

2 For the sake of convenience, parties to this revision will hereinafter be referred to as they are arrayed before the trail Court.

3 The factual matrix that led to filing of the present revision is as follows:

4 The respondent filed a private complaint against the petitioner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on the file of V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada. After following the due procedure, the learned V Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kakinada has taken cognizance of the offence against the petitioner under Section 138 of N.I. Act and numbered the complaint as C.C.No.60 of 2009 and issued summons. During the pendency of the case, the petitioner filed Crl.M.P.No.3417 of 2010 under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act to send the disputed signature on the cheque and promissory note to the handwriting expert for comparison with his admitted signatures and the said petition was allowed on 13.10.2010. Thereafter, the matter was transf

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top