SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA
Ramavath Nanu – Appellant
Versus
State of A.P. rep.by Public Prosecutor – Respondent


JUDGMENT:

The appellant/accused was convicted by the lower Court under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, the Act) and was sentenced to rigorous imprisonment of three years and fine of Rs.2,000/-. Questioning the same, the accused filed this appeal. It is alleged that the accused cultivated land in S.No.19/39 of Ippalapally village with cotton crop and in the midst of cotton crop, he raised 30,000 ganja plants illegally and that during raid by the Police officials along with the revenue officials, it was detected on 30.11.1999. Plea of the accused is one of total denial and not guilty. After trial, the lower Court found the accused guilty of the charge.

2. It is contended by the appellant’s counsel that there is no proper proof of the accused raising ganja in that land and that the prosecution failed to examine pattadar of the land to show that the land was in possession of the accused and that there were no independent mediators for the panchanama prepared by the Police and that the Police did not follow mandatory provisions of the Act in this case.

3. PW6 is the Sub Divisional Police Officer, NagarKurnool Sub-Division, who headed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top