JUDGMENT:

The unsuccessful plaintiff in Original Suit No.20 of 1989 on the file of the Court of Subordinate Judge, Bobbili (Now, Senior Civil Judge), Vizianagaram District, (For short, the 'trial Court') preferred this appeal challenging the decree and judgment dated 20.03.1995, wherein the suit filed for partition and other reliefs was dismissed.

2. For convenience of reference, the ranks given to the parties in O.S. No.20 of 1989 will be adopted throughout this judgment.

3. The plaintiff filed suit for partition of plaint ‘A’ and ‘B’ schedule property into 10 equal shares, allot one such share, and put her in separate possession of the property, after evicting defendants and for profits from the date of filing suit till the date of delivery of possession, alleging that Karri Simhachalanaidu, who died intestate, was the absolute owner of the schedule property which devolved upon him from his ancestors. His wife, who is not a party to the suit, also died intestate. The defendants are his sons who constituted as members of Hindu joint family. The plaintiff, being unmarried daughter of the 1st defendant and a coparcener in the joint family, is in joint possession and enjoyment of the pr