IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA RSA No.3 of 2003 Date of Decision: 17.12.2014 Smt. Sudarshan Dhawan and another ..Appellants Versus Smt. Radha Sharma ..Respondent Coram:

The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge.

Whether approved for reporting?1 No.

For the Appellants: Mr. Bhupender Gupta, Senior Advocate with Mr. Ajit Jaswal, Advocate.

For the Respondent: Nemo.

________________________________________________________

Dharam Chand Chaudhary, Judge (oral)

Defendants are in second appeal before this Court. They are aggrieved by the judgment and decree Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes …2…

dated 21.9.2002, passed by learned District Judge, Solan, in Civil Appeal No.29-S/13 of 1999, whereby the judgment and decree dated 30.3.1999, passed by learned Sub Judge, 1st Class, Solan, has been affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

2. Facts as disclosed from the record reveal that both the parties are residents of Mouza Saproon, Tehsil and District Solan. The respondent-plaintiff has purchased land measuring 187 square metres, bearing Khasra No.1513, Khewat/Khatauni No.19/42 and constructed a residential house thereon. Defendant Sardar Am