SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 6088

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
Meesala Saradhi and 8 Others – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 6 Others – Respondent


ORDER:

The case of the petitioners, precisely, as per the writ affidavit, is that they are running Shops (like Pan shop, Xerox & Internet shop, Sweet and Bakery shop etc.) in the land in Survey No.129 of Charla village and mandal, BhadradriKothagudem District; and the land is situated opposite to the RTC Bus stand and the land belongs to the Grampanchayat. They are paying the license fee to the Grampanchayat. On an earlier occasion, when the respondent-authorities have tried to demolish their shops, they filed writ petitions i.e., W.P.No.28203 of 2013, and W.P.No.12695 of 2020, and this Court directed the authorities to follow due process of law before taking action against the petitioners. It is the grievance of the petitioners now in this writ petition that the 2nd respondent-Executive Engineer issued a Notice dated 03.10.2020 (served on the petitioners on 04.10.2020) wherein the petitioners were directed to vacate the premises within seven days from the date of receipt of notice, or else they will be evicted.

2. Heard Mr. Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners; and learned Government Pleader for Roads & Buildings for respondent Nos.1 to 3; learned Standing Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top