Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
T. MADHAVI DEVI, J
EerlaBiksham – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the writ concerns the legal authority of vehicle seizure. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. the court’s observations favor the petitioner pending proceedings. (Para 5) |
| 3. final order on the release of the vehicle with conditions. (Para 6) |
ORDER
This writ petition is filed to declare the seizure of the petitioner’s vehicle i.e., Eicher Goods Carriage HMV bearing No.AP 16 TH 6866 (Telangana Registration) under the cover of panchanama dated 13.01.2025 in connection with Crime No.12 of 2025 of Thirumalgiri Police Station, Suryapet District, as arbitrary and unconstitutional.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Civil Supplies appearing on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and learned Government Pleader for Home appearing on behalf of respondent No.5.
3. The vehicle of the petitioner i.e., Eicher Goods Carriage HMV bearing No.AP 16 TH 6866 was seized under the cover of panchanama dated 13.01.2025 by respondent No.5 in connection with Crime No.12 of 2025 of Thirumalgiri Police Station, Suryapet District, under Section 318 (4) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNS ’) and Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 (for short
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
