Back
HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
M. Naveen Kumar – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims ownership of property obstructed by an electric pole. (Para 2) |
| 2. respondents suggest a procedural approach to resolve the obstruction. (Para 3) |
| 3. court allows petitioner to file representation for removal of the pole. (Para 4) |
ORDER
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Municipal Administration and Urban Development appearing for respondent No.1 and Sri Putta Krishna Reddy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Perused the record.
2. Petitioner herein is claiming that he is the absolute owner and possessor of house bearing No.3-103-4/4 (PTIN/Assessment No.2000005227) on part of plot No.14 in Sy.No.114/2, admeasuring 100 Sq.yds, situated at Boduppall Village within Boduppal Municipal Corporation, under registered sale deed bearing document No.7253 of 2023, dated 04.05.2023. Even then, respondent No.2 erected Electric pole in the property belongs to the petitioner. In proof of the same, he has filed photographs. He has made his request to respondent Nos.2 and 3 with a request to remove the said pole. They have not considered it. Challenging the said action of respondent Nos.2 and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
