SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 8115

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
P.SREE SUDHA, J
R. RAJANIKANTH KHAMMAM DIST – Appellant
Versus
PRL SECY INFRASTRUCTURE AND INVESTMENT DEPT HYD AND 3 OTHERS – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA WRIT PETITION No.22562 of 2010

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed declaring the inaction of respondent Nos.2 and 3 in not paying an amount of Rs.2,33,178 @ Rs.21,198 per month for 11 months i.e., from 26.11.2008 to 31.10.2009 towards @ 45.5% of basic pay per month for the perks and allowances and Rs.9,000/- (@ Rs.500/- per month) towards deputation allowance and Rs.52,966/- towards difference amount in the setting in allowance and an amount of Rs.5,490/- @ Rs.305 per month towards LPG refill reimbursement and in total Rs.3,00,634/- with interest as being illegal and arbitrary.

2. On 11.02.2025 heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioner but it was not reflected in the proceeding sheet and today the matter is posted for the arguments of learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 but he did not turn up. Therefore, arguments from the learned counsel for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 are treated as nil.

3. The brief facts of the case are that the writ petitioner herein is a permanent employee of Singareni Collieries Company Limited/respondent No.4 and while he was working as Deputy Superintendent (Analytical) in the grade of E5 at Re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top