SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 25084

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
Sri Gade Praveen Kumar, J
B. JITENDER KUMAR SECBAD AND ANO – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF INDIA SOCIAL JUSTI AND EMPOWERMENT N.DELHI AND 2 OTHR – Respondent
Writ Petition



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri M.N. Narasimha Reddy
For the Respondents: Sri K.L.N. Raghavendra Reddy, learned Deputy Solicitor General

The court affirmed that employees of an autonomous body are entitled to non-functional pay scales equivalent to Section Officers of CSS, emphasizing adherence to the Assured Career Progression Scheme and principles of natural justice.

Headnote:(A) Central Civil Service Rules - Assured Career Progression Scheme - Non-functional scale of Rs.8000-275-13500 - Petitioners, employees of an autonomous body, challenged withdrawal of their upgraded pay scale as arbitrary and illegal. The court found that the petitioners' roles were equivalent to Section Officers of Central Secretariat Service and their pay scales were granted in compliance with government guidelines. (Paras 1, 8, 10, 12)

(B) Recovery of excess payment - The court ruled that the respondents could not recover excess amounts paid to the petitioners, emphasizing the principles of natural justice and the precedent set in similar cases. (Paras 11, 14)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, employed at a national institute, were granted a non-functional pay scale after 12 years of service, which was later withdrawn by the respondents citing irregularities.

Findings of Court:
The court determined that the petitioners were entitled to the non-functional scale and that the withdrawal of the pay scale was unjustified.

Issues: Whether the petitioners' posts are equivalent to Section Officers of CSS and the legality of the withdrawal of the upgraded pay scale.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the petitioners were entitled to the non-functional scale based on their roles and previous government directives, and that the withdrawal of such scales without proper procedure violated principles of fair play.

Result: Writ Petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. petitioners seek non-functional scale. (Para 1 , 2)
2. respondents deny equivalence to css. (Para 3 , 4)
3. audit findings challenge petitioners' claims. (Para 5 , 6)
4. court reviews ministry's directives. (Para 7 , 8)
5. court emphasizes acp scheme applicability. (Para 9 , 10)
6. court references previous judgments. (Para 12)
7. court grants relief to petitioners. (Para 13 , 14)

O R D E R :

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents not to withdraw the order of granting non- functional scale of Rs.8000-275-13500 (pre-revised) with effect from 01.01.1996 and effect recovery holding that the office memorandum Nos. NIMH/Estt.6(2002)2010-11/801 dated 26.11.2010 and NIMH/Estt.6(2005)2010-11/802 dated 26.11.2010 served on petitioners as arbitrary and illegal.

2. Learned counsel for petitioners Sri M.N. Narasimha Reddy submits that petitioners are the employees of National Institute for the Mentally Handicapped (renamed as National Institute for the Empowerment of Persons with Intellectual Disabilities), Manovikas Nagar, Secunderabad (hereinafter referred to as ‘Institute / Society’). It is an autonomous body under the Department of Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities, Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment, Government of India. It is being registered under the Societies Registration Act and is administered by its bye-laws. The Society consists of various institutions similar to that of the institute involved in this writ petition. The Executive Council is the apex body as far as administration of each of the institutes. All the Executive Committees of different institutions, which are part and parcel of the Society, have to adopt the draft bye-laws and get the approval of the Government of India. In this process, the subject Institution, i.e. NIMH (NIEPID), Secunderabad, in their letter No. 87/3054 dated 14.10.1987 had adopted the draft bye-laws and subject to modification got the approval of the Government of India in its proceedings No. 6-15/87-NI-I, dated 02.05.1988, Government of India , Ministry of Social Welfare, New Delhi.

It is submitted that as per Bye-Law No. 4, the Executive Council has to frame the service conditions on par with Central Government Employees keeping in view their service conditions prescribed in Government of India Rules i.e. Central Civil Service Rules. Sub-clauses in Bye-law No. 4 relevant to this case are (i), (xi) and (xxi). In the same Bye-laws, the Directors' Powers are enumerated in Appendix-II. As per Appendix-II, under clause (xiv) Point Nos. 73 and 81, under Clause (xv) Point No. 82, the Director is competent as Cadre Controlling Authority to appoint Groups- B, C and D posts, to determine their nature of work and their pay and allowances. As per the powers conferred on the Executive Council in bye-laws, the Executive Council in its meeting held on 22.09.1984 and 25.10.1985 decided to adopt the Central Government scales to NIMH (NIEPID) Employees. As per the above discussion, it can be said / culled out that NIMH (NIEPID) Employees’ pay fixation is on par with Central Government Employees. The Director (who is the cadre controlling authority) is competent to appoint and decide pay scales, nature of work, etcetera, as far as Groups B, C and D Employees of the NIMH (NIEPID) Institute, i.e. subject institute.

It is submitted that, after formation of National Institute for Mentally Handicapped at Secunderabad, to fill up the vacancies in the organization, the Director issued employment notification for various posts. In the said notifications, the post of ‘Estate Officer’ and ‘Workshop Supervisor’ were notified. Pursuant to the said notification, petitioners applied for ‘Estate Officer’ and ‘Workshop Supervisor’ positions and got selected respectively. Even in the notification, it is mentioned that for the posts notified, status would be similar to that status of the Central Government Employees Service Conditions and Pay Scales, etcetera. They were issued a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top