COMMON ORDER :

Since the subject matter of both these cases is the same parcel of land and the respondent in the CMA is making a claim to a portion of it ostensibly on a promise made by Revenue officials of the State of Telangana to allot/assign it to him, they are being disposed of by this common order.

W.P.No.5049 of 2016

2. In this Writ Petition, the petitioner which is a company incorporated under the Companies Act and engaged in business of construction and sale of immovable property, has challenged order in Proceedings No.C/2835/2013 dt.13.11.2015 passed by Tahsildar, Tirumalagiri Mandal, Hyderabad District (4^th respondent) under Section 7 of the A.P. Land Encroachment Act, 1905 which was also confirmed in Appeal under Section 10 of the said Act by the Revenue Divisional Officer, Secunderabad Division, Hyderabad (3^rd respondent) in Proceeding No.B/3701/2015 dt.13.02.2016.

3. The 1^st respondent in the writ petition is the State of Telangana and the 2^nd respondent is the District Collector, Hyderabad District.

Background facts

4. The petitioner company had obtained a Development Agreement-cum-General Power of Attorney from legal heirs of late S.K.Heeralal and others vide registered