SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 49227

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, CJ
M/s. Naolin Infrastructure Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
M/s. Kalpana Industries – Respondent


THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE ARBITRATION APPLICATION No.162 of 2023

ORDER:

Mr. P.Pratap, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. Dinesh K. Gilda, learned counsel representing Mr. Damodar Mundra, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. This application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as, “the Act”) has been filed for appointment of an arbitrator.

3. Facts giving rise to filing of this application briefly stated are that the parties had entered into an agreement on 03.09.2016. The agreement admittedly contains an arbitration clause. A dispute between the parties under the agreement had arisen. Therefore, the applicant had issued a notice on 24.11.2018 to which the respondent submitted response on 05.12.2018. However, the applicant did not take any further steps.

4. In the meanwhile, the respondent filed a civil suit, namely Civil Case No.39 of 2020, for recovery of an amount of Rs.63,75,356/- along with interest. In the aforesaid civil suit, the applicant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC). The aforesaid application was rejected by an order dated 06.04.2022 by the Upp

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top