Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N/A, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
1st respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims ownership of land. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dispute over land as waqf property. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments regarding legality of waqf notification. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. counterarguments on waqf property classification. (Para 7) |
| 5. court's observations on appeal process. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 6. writ petition dismissed; appeal to proceed. (Para 10) |
O R D E R :
Petitioner questions A.P. Gazette Notification No. 28-A, dated 13.07.2006 which included land in Survey Nos.95, 96, 97 and 98 at Sangala Village, Gadwal Mandal, Mahabubnagar District as waqf property, as illegal. Consequently, a direction is sought to the 1st respondent to dispose of the pending Appeal in File No. F2/IA-35/2010 filed by the 4th respondent against grant of Occupancy Rights Certificate (ORC) granted by the 2nd respondent in respect of the above land in favour of petitioner and his family members without being influenced by the Gazette Notification.
2. Petitioner and his brothers claim to be the absolute owners of the subject agriculture land. The land's historical classification as Kyrathi Inam is documented in Khasra Pahani 1954-55 and Sethwar 1334 Fasli. Gadwal Samasthan initially settled the land in favo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
