SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 48304

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SAMBASIVARAO NAIDU, J
D.Subhash – Appellant
Versus
Saroj M.Sankala – Respondent


THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SAMBASI VA RAO NAI DU

JUDGMENT:

Being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated

11-09-2017 in OS.No.882 of 2008 on the file of Additional Judge Cum VI Senior Judge, Hyderabad, where under, the suit filed by the respondent Nos.1 and 2 against respondents No.3 to 7 and also against the present appellant was decreed by the trial Court, the 6th defendant in the above referred suit has filed this first Civil Appeal under Section 96 of Civil Procedure Code (for short ‘C.P.C.’) r/w Order 41 Rule 1 of CPC with a prayer to set aside the impugned judgment and dismissed the suit filed by the respondent No.1 herein.

2. Before adverting to the grounds under which this appeal is filed, it is just and necessary to refer the averments made by the 1st respondent/plaintiff in the above referred suit and as to how the other parties to the suit contested the same.

3. The parties will be referred to as they are arrayed in the original suit. The plaintiff No.1 has filed the said suit with a prayer to declare the survey conducted by defendant No.1 and its report dated 22-03-2007 is null and void and not binding the plaintiffs and also for a consequential injunction to restrain the d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top