SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 53237

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, CJ
Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Governor of Telangana – Respondent
W.P.No.180 of 2024 | W.P.No.181 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

The Governor must act according to the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in nominating members to the Legislative Council, and such actions are subject to judicial review for legality.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 171(5) and 361 - Judicial review of the Governor's actions - The Governor's rejection of nominations for the Legislative Council was quashed, affirming that the Governor must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. The Governor has discretion to examine eligibility but cannot reject nominations without valid grounds. (Paras 26-37)

(B) Judicial Review - Scope and Limits - The Governor's actions are subject to judicial review if they are ultra vires or suffer from mala fides, notwithstanding the immunity granted under Article 361. (Paras 27.1-27.7)

(C) Discretion of the Governor - The Governor's discretion under Article 171(5) is limited; he must act based on the recommendations of the Council of Ministers, barring exceptional circumstances. (Paras 28.1-28.11)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners were nominated by the Council of Ministers for the Legislative Council, but the Governor rejected their nominations citing lack of qualifications and documentation. Subsequent nominations were made during the pendency of the petitions.

Findings of Court:
The court found the Governor's rejection of the nominations unjustified and ruled that the nominations should have been accepted or sent back for reconsideration.

Issues: Whether the Governor's rejection of nominations was lawful, the scope of judicial review, and the petitioners' locus standi were central issues.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Governor must act on the Council's advice and cannot unilaterally reject nominations without valid reasons.

Result: The petitions were allowed, quashing the Governor's orders and subsequent nominations.

Table of Content
1. bicameral legislature and governor's nomination powers. (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners' qualifications and governor's rejection. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. subsequent nominations by council of ministers. (Para 6 , 7)
4. arguments against governor's rejection of nominations. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
5. state's defense and locus standi arguments. (Para 12 , 13)
6. arguments from respondent nos. 4 and 5. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
7. rejoinder submissions from petitioners. (Para 17 , 18)
8. governor's powers and constitutional framework. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
9. judicial review and immunity under article 361. (Para 26)
10. scope of governor's powers under article 171. (Para 32)
11. court's conclusions on the governor's actions. (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36)
12. final order and directives to the governor. (Para 37)

COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)

(i) INTRODUCTION:

The State Legislature in Telangana is bicameral in nature. It has two Houses of Legislature, namely Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council. The Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 , was enacted to provide for the creation of Legislative Council for the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh and for matters supplemental, incidental and consequential thereto. Section 3 of the said Act provided for creation of Legislative Council for the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh. The erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated into two successor States, namely the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh. Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 , provides that there shall be a Legislative Council for the successor States. Section 23 of the Reorganisation Act, 2014, provides that there shall be 40 seats in the Legislative Council for the State of Telangana. Out of the aforesaid 40 seats, six are to be filled up by the Governor under Article 171(3) read with Article 171(5) and (6) of the Constitution of India .

2. The core issue involved in these writ petitions is about the scope and power of the Governor under Article 171(5) of the Constitution of India to make nominations for the Legislative Council of State of Telangana. In order to appreciate the grievance of the petitioners, relevant facts which lie in narrow compass need mention which are stated infra.

(ii) FACTS:

3. The petitioner in W.P.No.180 of 2024 has LL.B., degree and also has secured two Masters’ Degrees namely, Master of Arts with Specialization in Linguistics and Master of Business Administration. He has also worked as Project Associate with Administrative Staff College of India, wherein he was associated with internationally funded research projects. The petitioner has also served as Senior Assistant Professor in Human Resources Management with the Premier Institute of Public Enterprise, Hyderabad and was awarded Doctorate degree in “Organizational Behavior” from Osmania University. He has also served as Director of Human Resource Development with M/s.Ceeyes Software Technologies Private Limited, and was also associated with M/s.Sierra Atlantic Inc as Associate Director. The petitioner has also served as General Manager (HR) in M/s.Satyam Computer Services Limited. The petitioner, initially, joined in Indian National Congress. However, subsequently, he joined in Telangana Rashtra Samithi, a political party and claims to have functioned as a star campaigner of the party in Hyderabad city. The petitioner in W.P.No.181 of 2024 has Bachelor’s degree in Arts. He was a trade union leader and is a social worker.

4. A meeting of the Council of Ministers was held on 31.07.2023, wherein it was resolved to nominate the petitioners as Members of Legislative Council. However, the Governor by orders dated 19.09.2023 rejected the nomination of the petitioners for the post of Member of Legislative Council under Article 171(5) of the Constitution of India inter alia on the following grounds:

(i) There is no apparent fulfillment of the pre-conditions required under Article 171

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top