SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Telangana) 45771

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, CJ
Sri. Kurra Satyanarayana – Appellant
Versus
The Secretary to Her Excellency – Respondent
Writ Petition | W.P.No.180 of 2024 | W.P.No.181 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not specified
For the Respondents: Not specified

The Governor must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in legislative nominations, and judicial review is permissible for actions exceeding constitutional authority.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Articles 171(3), 171(5), and 361 - The Governor's power to nominate members to the Legislative Council of Telangana and the scope of judicial review of the Governor's actions were examined. The rejection of nominations due to lack of special achievements and documentation was deemed inappropriate. The court ruled that the Governor must act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers, and the impugned orders were quashed. (Paras 1, 26, 37)

(B) Judicial Review - The court clarified that while the Governor enjoys immunity under Article 361, actions can be subject to judicial review if they are ultra vires or suffer from mala fides. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to constitutional provisions and the role of the Council of Ministers in the nomination process. (Paras 29, 37)

Facts of the case:
The petitioners, whose nominations for the Legislative Council were rejected by the Governor, challenged the validity of these rejections, asserting that the Governor acted beyond constitutional authority and violated their legitimate expectations. (Paras 4, 37)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Governor's rejection of the nominations lacked sufficient grounds and documentation and ruled that the nominations should have been reconsidered. (Paras 35, 37)

Issues: The main issues included the Governor's discretion in nominations, the maintainability of the writ petitions, and the validity of the Governor's orders rejecting the nominations. (Paras 26, 30)

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the Governor must act on the advice of the Council of Ministers under Article 171(5) and that judicial review is permissible when the Governor's actions are beyond constitutional authority. (Paras 29, 37)

Result: The writ petitions were allowed, and the impugned orders were quashed. The Governor is bound to act in accordance with the Council of Ministers' advice. (Paras 37)

Table of Content
1. bicameral legislature and governor's powers (Para 1 , 2)
2. petitioners’ qualifications and nomination process (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. subsequent events affecting nominations (Para 6 , 7)
4. judicial review of governor's decisions (Para 8 , 9)
5. arguments against governor's discretion (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
6. state's defense of governor's actions (Para 13 , 14)
7. legal rights of nominees and petitioners (Para 15 , 16)
8. petitioners' legitimate expectation (Para 17 , 18)
9. court's review of governor's actions (Para 19 , 20)
10. governor's powers under the constitution (Para 21 , 22 , 24)
11. immunity of governor under article 361 (Para 23 , 26)
12. consequences of governor's actions (Para 32 , 33)
13. final orders and implications (Para 34 , 35 , 36)
14. conclusion of the judgment (Para 37)

COMMON ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)

(i) INTRODUCTION:

The State Legislature in Telangana is bicameral in nature. It has two Houses of Legislature, namely Legislative Assembly and Legislative Council. The Andhra Pradesh Legislative Council Act, 2005 , was enacted to provide for the creation of Legislative Council for the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh and for matters supplemental, incidental and consequential thereto. Section 3 of the said Act provided for creation of Legislative Council for the erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh. The erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh was bifurcated into two successor States, namely the State of Telangana and the State of Andhra Pradesh. Section 22 of the Andhra Pradesh Reorganisation Act, 2014 , provides that there shall be a Legislative Council for the successor States. Section 23 of the Reorganisation Act, 2014, provides that there shall be 40 seats in the Legislative Council for the State of Telangana. Out of the aforesaid 40 seats, six are to be filled up by the Governor under Article 171(3) read with Article 171(5) and (6) of the Constitution of India .

2. The core issue involved in these writ petitions is about the scope and power of the Governor under Article 171(5) of the Constitution of India to make nominations for the Legislative Council of State of Telangana. In order to appreciate the grievance of the petitioners, relevant facts which lie in narrow compass need mention which are stated infra.

(ii) FACTS:

3. The petitioner in W.P.No.180 of 2024 has LL.B., degree and also has secured two Masters’ Degrees namely, Master of Arts with Specialization in Linguistics and Master of Business Administration. He has also worked as Project Associate with Administrative Staff College of India, wherein he was associated with internationally funded research projects. The petitioner has also served as Senior Assistant Professor in Human Resources Management with the Premier Institute of Public Enterprise, Hyderabad and was awarded Doctorate degree in “Organizational Behavior” from Osmania University. He has also served as Director of Human Resource Development with M/s.Ceeyes Software Technologies Private Limited, and was also associated with M/s.Sierra Atlantic Inc as Associate Director. The petitioner has also served as General Manager (HR) in M/s.Satyam Computer Services Limited. The petitioner, initially, joined in Indian National Congress. However, subsequently, he joined in Telangana Rashtra Samithi, a political party and claims to have functioned as a star campaigner of the party in Hyderabad city. The petitioner in W.P.No.181 of 2024 has Bachelor’s degree in Arts. He was a trade union leader and is a social worker.

4. A meeting of the Council of Ministers was held on 31.07.2023, wherein it was resolved to nominate the petitioners as Members of Legislative Council. However, the Governor by orders dated 19.09.2023 rejected the nomination of the petitioners for the post of Member of Legislative Council under Article 171(5) of the Constitution of India inter alia on the following grounds:

(i) There is no apparent fulfillment of the pre-conditions required under Article 171(5) of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top