SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 27584

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J, ALOK ARADHE, CJ
SECY FOREST DEPT HYD AND 2 OT – Appellant
Versus
VADIYALA PRABHAKAR RAO KHAMMAM DIST AND 10 OT – Respondent


THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT APPEAL No.910 OF 2012 JUDGMENT: (per the Hon’ble Shri Justice Anil Kumar Jukanti)

Mr. Mohammed Imran Khan, learned Additional Advocate General appears on behalf of the appellants.

Mr. R. R. Kalyan, learned counsel represents Mr. R. Kameswar Rao, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondents.

2. This intra court appeal is filed against the order dated 27.03.2012 passed by learned Single Judge in W.P.No.19107 of 2003 preferred by the appellants has been allowed.

3. Brief facts:

The appellants are respondents in the writ petition. The writ petition is filed challenging order dated 19.05.2003 passed by the Joint Collector, Khammam, as illegal and to direct the forest settlement officer i.e., Joint Collector to consider claims of the petitioners in Survey No.81 to an extent of Acs.600.00 of Kalavalanagaram Village in erstwhile Palvancha Taluk of Khammam District. Land to an extent of Acs.717.18 guntas in Survey No.81 of Kalavalanagaram Village of Pinapaka Mandal, was proposed for reserving in forest block and the same was notified under Section 4 of the Hyderabad Forest Act 1 of 1355 Fasli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top