Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
AL Sadanandam – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' claims for land acquisition and constitutional rights. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. background and history of the acquisitions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. arguments from respondents regarding acquisition integrity. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
COMMON ORDER:
Heard learned senior designate counsel Sri B. Chandrasen Reddy, representing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioners and learned standing counsel Mr. L. Prabhakar Reddy appearing on behalf of TSI I C Respondent No.4 and learned counsel Mr. P. Ravicharan, Link Legal Advocate appearing on behalf of Respondent No.8, learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos.1 to 3 and 7.
2. The petitioner approached the court in W.P.No.
No.1245 of 2012 seeking prayer as under:
“to issue a writ or order/s more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus setting aside the registration of lease and conveyance deeds bearing document no. 20560/2005 and 20562/2005 both dated 28-12-2005 on the file of the seventh respondent, by declaring the action of the respondents no. 4, 5 and 6 of the diversification of the acquired land in survey no. 48 of Nanakramguda village, Serilingampalli mandal, Ranga Reddy di
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
