IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J
Uddaraju Suresh Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER:
Heard Ms. K.Kalyani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Revenue appearing on behalf of respondent Nos. 1 to 6, Mr. Mr.Rajagopallavan, Mr P.Srinivas, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.7, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent Nos.8 and 10, and Mr. K.V.Raman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.11.
2. The Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :
“.....to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ of PROHIBITION restraining respondent no.3 from proceeding any further in review petition proceedings ie., Rc.No.A2/1234/2019 in case No.A2/1500/2018 filed by the respondent No.7 herein purportedly U/sec.166 of Telangana Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli pending before it OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE this Hon'ble court may be pleased to issue appropriate writ, order or direction, particularly a writ of MANDAMUS declaring the proceedings in review petition proceedings i.e., Rc.No.A2/1234/2019 in case No.A2/1500/2018 filed by the respondent No.7 herein purportedly U/sec.166 of Telangana Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli pending before respondent no.3 as without jurisdiction, illegal
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.