SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 31734

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J
GMR Hyderabad International Airport Limited – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent
Writ Petition No.22672 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.S.Niranjan Reddy
For the Respondents: Government Pleader for Stamps and Registration

The court ruled that the registration period suspension due to government orders should be considered when calculating the four-month limitation for registration, reinforcing natural justice principles.

Headnote:(A) Registration Act, 1908 - Sections 23, 25, and Rule 38 - Writ petition filed to challenge fine imposed for delayed registration of documents - Petitioners claimed exclusion of 92 days registration suspension period due to government order - Court emphasized principles of natural justice and exclusion of suspension period for limitation calculations -- Court quashed the notice imposing penalty and directed fresh consideration of documents without penalty. (Paras 26-36)

(B) Natural Justice - Violation of basic principles of natural justice when notice issued without affording opportunity of hearing to petitioners. (Paras 10, 11, 35)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners executed deeds on 29.09.2020 during a suspension period, sought registration but faced penalties for late presentation. They argued suspension period should be excluded.

Findings of Court:
The period of suspension for registrations must be included in the limitation calculation, leading to deemed timely submission of documents.

Issues: Whether the suspension period affects the limitation period for document registration.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the suspended registration period must be excluded when calculating the four-month limitation under the Registration Act.

Result: Writ petition allowed; penalty notice quashed.

Table of Content
1. factual background on lease and agreements. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments on delayed registration and fines. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
3. petitioners' claims regarding penalty waiver. (Para 11 , 12 , 19)
4. legal standards during pandemic and limitation periods. (Para 20 , 21 , 22)
5. court's analysis of registration laws during emergencies. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33)
6. establishment of grounds for quashing penalty. (Para 35)
7. court's final decision and directive to respondents. (Para 36)

ORDER:

This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India declaring the action of respondent No.2 in issuing the impugned notice dated 19.08.2021 calling upon the petitioners to pay a fine/penalty equivalent to five times of the Registration fee of the two deeds i.e., the Conveyance Deed and Sub-Lease deed dated 29.09.2020 within one month from the date of the notice, without affording the petitioners with a reasonable opportunity of hearing and without considering the request made by the petitioner to exclude the 92 days period of suspension of registrations imposed by respondent No.1, while calculating four months’ period provided under the statute, as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the principles of natural justice apart from being violative of the rights of the petitioner guaranteed under Article 19(1)(g), Article 14 and Article 21 and set aside the same and consequently direct respondent No.2 to consider the two deeds i.e., the conveyance deed and sub-lease deed dated 20.09.2020 presented by petitioners for registration on 12.03.2021 without insisting on payment of any penalty/fine.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 are both represented by its CEO. Petitioner No.1 is a Company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 and is part of GMR Group which is leading global infrastructure with various projects in Airports, Energy, Transportation, Urban Infrastructure and in sports and is maintaining the World Class Greenfield International Airport by name Rajiv Gandhi International Airport, Hyderabad.

3. In the year 2003, a land lease agreement dated 30- 09-2003 was executed by the State Government whereby land admeasuring about Ac.5500 has been given on lease by the State Government to the petitioner No.1 for the development of the airport and for other commercial departments for the socio economic growth of the region. Thereafter a Concession Agreement dated 20.12.2004, was executed with Government of India through the Ministry of Civil Aviation, with petitioner No.1 for designing, financing, construction, operation and maintenance of the Airport at Shamshabad, Hyderabad.

4. It is submitted that the provision of Air Cargo Terminal Services is one of the concessions granted under the said agreement. In order to facilitate for providing the Air Cargo Services at Airport, petitioner No.1 constructed Air Cargo Terminal Building (ACT Building). Petitioner No.1 incorporated 2nd petitioner as its wholly owned subsidiary, for providing air cargo services including warehouse handling, build-up and breakdown ULDs, general supervision, tracing and irregularity, management, customs, interface etc., in an efficient manner. As a part of the business requirements, petitioner No.1 executed a conveyance deed dated 29.09.2020, whereby the aforementioned ACT Building was conveyed in favour of petitioner No.2 herein which is its wholly owned subsidiary. Petitioner No.1 also executed a separate sub- lease deed dated 29.09.2020, in respect of the above ACT Building Land with rights to grant sub-lease, sub-sub- lease etc.

5. It is submitted that as per Section 23 of the Registration Act, 1908 (for brevity ‘the Act’ hereinafter) all documents except a Will have to be presented for registration before the concerned Registrar or Sub- Registrar within four (4) months from the date of execution of such document. Further, Section 25 of the Act provides that due to an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top