Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Husband – Appellant
Versus
Wife – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. marriage and initial happiness. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. allegations of cruelty and counter claims. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 3. burden of proof for cruelty. (Para 36 , 41) |
| 4. maintenance awarded based on income. (Para 43 , 49) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeal. (Para 50) |
COMMON JUDGMENT : (Per Hon’ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)
Heard Sri S.Surender Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the appellant in F.C.A.No.110 of 2012, learned counsel for the petitioner in Crl.R.C.No.1596 of 2009 and Sri N.Ashok Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondents in both the appeal and criminal revision case. Perused the record.
2. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the common order and decree dated 30.07.2009 in F.C.O.P.No.76 of 2008 and F.C.M.C.No.82 of 2008 passed by learned Judge, Family Court- cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge at Karimnagar, appellant-husband preferred F.C.A.No.110 of 2012 and Crl.R.C.No.1596 of 2009.
3. This Court vide order dated 24.09.2009 in Crl.R.C.M.P.No.2208 of 2009 in Crl.R.C.No.1596 of 2009 granted interim stay of the order dated 30.07.2009 passed in F.C.M.C.No.82 of 2008 on the file of the Judge, Family Court- cum-Additional District and Sessions Judge, Karimnagar, on
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
