Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Appellant-husband – Appellant
Versus
Respondent-wife – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. grounds for divorce based on cruelty. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. respondent's claims about impotency and cruelty. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. evidence supporting claims of impotency. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 4. legal standards for establishing cruelty. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 5. implications of impotency on marriage. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 6. definition and scope of mental cruelty. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. effects of conduct on the victimized spouse. (Para 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 8. determining permanent alimony. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 9. dismissal of appeals and final orders. (Para 43 , 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice K.Lakshman)
Heard Sri G.Narender Raj, learned counsel for the appellant in F.C.A.No.231 of 2013 and learned counsel for the respondent in F.C.A.No.239 of 2013 and Sri V.R.Machavaram, learned counsel for the appellant in F.C.A.No.239 of 2013 and learned counsel for the respondent in F.C.A.No.231 of 2013.
2. The parties hereinafter are referred to as they are arrayed in F.C.A.No.231 of 2013.
3. Respondent-wife had filed a petition vide F.C.O.P.No.585 of 2011 under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1956 against the appellant-husband seeking dissolution of marriage
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
