Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, J
wife – Appellant
Versus
husband – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case origins and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. trial court's order on interim maintenance. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. affidavits of assets and liabilities filed by both parties. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 4. trial court's observations on maintenance claims. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. legal principles regarding maintenance obligations. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 6. final order on interim maintenance. (Para 41) |
COMMON ORDER:
Both these matters are arising out of the judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.119 of 2022 dated 10.07.2023 passed by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Rangareddy District.
2. Crl.R.C.No.506 of 2023 is filed by the wife – petitioner No.1 aggrieved by the judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.119 of 2022 dated 10.07.2023 by the Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Cyberabad at L.B.Nagar, Rangareddy District for setting aside the maintenance granted to her in Crl.M.P.No.772 of 2022 in D.V.C.No.8 of 2020 dated 18.07.2022 by the XIV Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Hayathnagar.
3. Crl.R.C.No.519 of 2023 is filed by the husband aggrieved by the judgment passed in Criminal Appeal No.119
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
