Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, CJ, ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI, J
K. Bikshapathi – Appellant
Versus
The Government of Andhra Pradesh rep.by the – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing facts of the petitioner's status and the basis for the writ petition. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments from both sides regarding the authority of the mro and succession issues. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. observations on the rights of protected tenants and procedural adherence. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 4. the court's ratio concerning succession and the role of the civil court. (Para 8) |
| 5. final resolution and directive for the respondent to proceed on the application. (Para 10 , 11) |
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR JUKANTI WRIT PETITION No.8453 OF 2008 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble Shri Justice Anil Kumar Jukanti)
Mr. P.Lakshma Reddy, learned counsel, appears for the petitioners.
Mr. K.Muralidhar, learned Government Pleader for Revenue, appears for respondent Nos.1 and 2.
2. This Writ Petition is filed seeking the following relief:
“…to issue a writ, order or a direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the Memo No.B/858/2007, dated 20.08.2007 of the second respondent as being irregular, unreasonable and contrary to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 19
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
