SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 32596

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, CJ
Sri Sai Krishna Constructions – Appellant
Versus
Harvins Constructions P Limited. – Respondent


THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE ARBITRATION APPLICATION Nos.221 of 2023 and 32 of 2024

COMMON ORDER:

Ms. D.Neeharika Reddy, learned counsel for the applicant.

Mr. V.Ravinder Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. Sunita Nawandar, learned counsel for the respondent.

2. By means of these applications under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’), the applicant seeks appointment of an arbitrator.

3. Facts giving rise to filing of these applications briefly stated are that the applicant is a Partnership Firm registered under the provisions of the Partnership Act, 1932. The applicant is engaged in the business of construction works and executes contracts for civil engineering works. The respondent is a Private Limited company and is engaged in the business of procuring civil engineering works by tendering with Public Works Department. The respondent gets the work executed by engaging specialists in the field by engaging the sub contractor.

4. The case of the applicant is that the respondent has engaged the applicant as sub-contractor by executing sub- contract agreement for 9 out of 10 works. It is the case of the app

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top