IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
C.V. BHASKAR REDDY, J
THE REGL.P.F.COMMISSIONERI HYDERABAD. – Appellant
Versus
EMPLOYEES P.F.APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI AND ANR. – Respondent
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.BHASKAR REDDY WRIT PETITION No.28046 of 2014
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed aggrieved by the order, dated
18.07.2014 passed by respondent No.1 in A.T.A.No.386(1)
2012.
2. The case of the petitioner is that respondent No.2 is an establishment covered under the provisions of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short “the Act”) and as respondent No.2 failed to pay the dues in respect of certain employees, an enquiry under Section 7-A of the Act was initiated by the petitioner and an order, dated 24.02.2012 was passed treating the honorarium paid to the lecturers appointed for stop gap arrangement as wages and determining the Provident Fund dues. Aggrieved by the same, respondent No.2 filed A.T.A.No.386(1)2012 before respondent No.1.
3. The contention of respondent No.2 before the Tribunal is that stop-gap arrangement cannot be treated as permanent employment to fasten the liability on it for remitting the contributions under the provisions of the Act. It is also contended that the lecturers/teachers were engaged for shorter duration during the absence of regular lecturers and therefore, the employees working on payment of hon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.