2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 36172
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
J SREENIVAS RAO, J, ALOK ARADHE, CJ
Aleti Mohan Reddy S/o. Aleti Bhooma Reddy – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector – Respondent
WP/28057/2013
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE J. SREENIVAS RAO WRIT PETITION No.28057 of 2013 ORDER: (per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Alok Aradhe)
Mr. S. Surender Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. In this writ petition, the petitioner has sought for the following prayer:
“For all the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit it is therefore prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction, more particularly a writ of mandamus declaring the orders passed by the 1st respondent vide proceedings No.B/2229/2012-AP-07, dated 12.09.2012 which are passed without considering the existing market and registration value for the acquisition of various extent of lands of the petitioner situated at Neredigonda Village and Mandal, Adilabad District for the purpose of laying 4/6 lane of NH-7 road even though the registration and the market value is higher side as per the report of the Sub-Registrar, Boath, Adilabad District as illegal, arbitrary, abuse of process of law, against the provisions of National Highways Act, 1956 and is a clear case of violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to determine the compensation as per the existing market value by considering the report submitted by the Sub-Registrar, Boath and to pay the enhanced compensation with interest from the date of acquisition of the properties of the petitioner by setting aside the orders passed by the 1st respondent dated 12.09.2012 in the interest of justice and pass such other order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.”
3. A Division Bench of this Court by order dated 03.04.2024 has dismissed W.P.No.25618 of 2013. It is not in dispute before us that the issue involved in this writ petition is answered by a Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.25618 of 2013.
4. For the reasons assigned by the Division Bench of this Court in W.P.No.25618 of 2013, this writ petition is also dismissed.
Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
____________________ ALOK ARADHE, CJ _______________________ J. SREENIVAS RAO, J Date: 02.09.2024.
ES