SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 36315

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E. V. VENUGOPAL, J
PARLE AGRO – Appellant
Versus
PRL.SECY. HOME DEPT. HYD. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE E.V.VENUGOPAL WRIT PETITION NO.27482 OF 2017

O R D E R:

The relief sought in the writ petition is as follows:

“….to issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly in the nature of a Writ of Certiorari, quashing the C.C.No.2 of 2011 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Kamareddy, Nizamabad District and pass such other order or orders.”

2. Heard Mr.Vikram Poosarla, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and Mr.Aniketh Reddy, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home representing respondent No.1-State. Perused the material available on record.

3. It is the case of petitioner that, respondent No.2 lifted one of the products of the petitioner company i.e., Frooti Mango Drink 200 ml Tetra Pack, Lot No.E052C EPO 19987-R manufactured on 08.05.2010. The said sample has been sent to analysis on 20.05.2010 and it has been analysed by the expert vide its report dated 01.07.2010. The expert opined that the said sample does not confirm to the standards of the total plate count and therefore, it is adulterated.

4. Basing on the report a case has been filed on 23.12.2010 and the same is numbered as C.C.No.2 of 2011 on the file o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top