SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 37634

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUJOY PAUL, NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO, JJ
Mohammed Zaker – Appellant
Versus
The Government of India – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.19028 of 2024 ORDER (per Hon’ble SP,J)

Sri Syed Iliyas, learned counsel, appeared for the petitioner, Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, appeared for respondent No.1 and Ms. J.Sunitha, learned Junior Standing Counsel representing Sri P. Murali Krishna, learned Senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, appeared for respondent Nos.2 to 4.

2. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution assails the assessment order dated 16.03.2024.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that the petitioner preferred a statutory appeal before the appellate authority against the impugned assessment order and the said appeal is still pending. Since the petitioner has not deposited the requisite statutory amount for preferring appeal, the appellate authority is not hearing him on the said aspect. The petitioner has already preferred an application seeking withdrawal of the said appeal with the liberty to file another appeal in future, if required.

4. By placing reliance on the judgments

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top