SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 38492

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SURENDER, J
M/S AGARWAL FOUNDARIES – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF AP REP PP HYD. AND ANOTHER – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SURENDER CRIMINAL APPEAL No.1184 OF 2013

JUDGMENT:

1. The appellant has preferred the present appeal questioning the judgment of acquittal dated 02.11.2007 in C.C.No.2097 of 2003, passed by the learned XI Additional Metropolitan Magistrate, Secunderabad.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.

3. The appellant is the complainant who filed complaint under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 before the trial Court, aggrieved by the dishonour of cheques issued by the respondent, who is the Managing Director of M/s.HCL Agro Power Limited. The said Company issued two cheques for a total amount of Rs.5,33,534/-.

4. The Complaint was filed against the Managing Director namely K.Gopi Prasad. The company on whose behalf cheques were issued and signed by K.Gopi Prasad, is not made a party to the criminal proceeding before the trial Court.

5. Under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 any person including Managing Director who is responsible for managing day to day affairs of the company can be made as accused. The said person would be vicariously liable along with the company. Since the Company which has drawn the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top