Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Ajmera Shyam – Appellant
Versus
Smt.Kova Laxmi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. election petition filed under the representation of the people act. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner's contention on nomination submission non-compliance. (Para 3) |
| 3. respondent's counterarguments against petitioner's claims. (Para 4) |
| 4. court's framing of issues based on contentions. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 5. interconnected issues need to be discussed together. (Para 7) |
| 6. understanding requirements under sec 100 of the act. (Para 8) |
| 7. right to know impacts election integrity. (Para 9) |
| 8. final conclusion on dismissal of election petition. (Para 10) |
ORDER
Heard Mr. C. Raghu, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. R. Giri Kumar, learned counsel for Election Petitioner and Mr. J. Ramachandra Rao, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. S. Santosh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 - Returned Candidate.
2. This Election Petition is filed by the Election Petitioner under Sections - 11 (a), 33, 33(A), 34, 80, 80A, 81, 83, 84, 100 (1) (a) (b) (d), 101, 123 and 125 (a) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Act, 1951’), to set aside the election of respondent No.1 as the Member of Telangana Legislative Assembly from 005-Asifabad Assembly Const
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
