SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40571

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. SUJANA, J
Gugulothu Pandu – Appellant
Versus
The State Of Telangana – Respondent
CRLP/13699/2024



THE HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE K. SUJANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.13699 of 2024

ORDER :

This criminal petition is filed by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 7 under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhitha (for short ‘BNSS’) seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.374 of 2024 of P.S. Thangallapalli, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) and 112(2) r/w. 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhitha, 2023 (for short ‘BNS’) and Section 7-A of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955.

2. Heard Sri Somavarapu Satyanarayana, learned counsel for petitioners and Mr. Syed Yasar Manoon, learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and perused the record.

3. When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for petitioners that petitioner/accused No.1 was already arrested in another crime and an application for execution of P.T. Warrant is filed before the trial Court, to remand him in the present crime.

4. In view of the aforesaid submission, this Criminal Petition is dismissed insofar as petitioner/accused No.1 is concerned.

5. As far as petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 7 are concerned, since the punishment prescribed for the offences alleged against them are punishable with below seven years of imprisonment, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the petitioners/accused Nos.2 to 7 to appear before the Investigating Officer on or before 10.12.2024 in between 11.00 a.m. and 05.00 p.m. and in turn, the Investigating Officer is directed to follow the procedure laid down under Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) (Previously Section 41- A of Cr.P.C.) and also the guidelines formulated by the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar and another scrupulously. However, the petitioners shall submit their defense and co-operate with the Investigating Officer as and when required by furnishing information and produce all relevant documents/ material required for the purpose of the investigation and the Investigating Officer shall consider the same before filing appropriate report before the learned Magistrate concerned.

1 (2014) 8 SCC 273

6. Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is disposed of.

____________

K. SUJANA Date: 02.12.2024 Note: Furnish C.C. tomorrow.

B/o.

rev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top