IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
The Prudential Cooperative Bank Ltd. rastrapathi Rao – Appellant
Versus
The A.P. Cooperative Tribunal Chandravihar – Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITIONS No. 10029 AND 13025 OF 2008 AND WRIT PETITION No. 9510 OF 2009
COMMON ORDER:
WRIT PETITIONS No. 10029 AND 13025 OF 2008 In Writ Petition No. 10029 of 2008, heard Sri M.
Venkata Divakar, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation on behalf of the Tribunal, Sri G. Rama Sharma, learned counsel for the 1st respondent, Sri R.V.Nagabhushanam Rao, learned counsel for the 4th respondent. In Writ Petition No. 13025 of 2008, heard Sri R.V. Nagabhushanam Rao, learned counsel for petitioner, learned Government Pleader for Cooperation on behalf of the 1st respondent and Sri M. Venkata Divakar, learned counsel for the
6th respondent.
2. Both these Writ Petitions are preferred against the Judgment in O.P. No. 1038 of 2000 dated 18.02.2008 on the file of the A.P. Cooperative Tribunal at Hyderabad. Hence, with the consent of learned counsel for both the parties, these Writ Petitions are disposed of by this common order.
3. Parties are referred to as arrayed in O.P. No.1038 of 2000. Petitioner is Bank. Respondent No.1 is borrower, Respondents 2 to 7 are guarantors and Respondent No.8 is purchaser of the property in quest
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.