SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 40731

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA, J
M.A. AKHIL HYD. – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMANDANT HYD. AND 2 OTHERS – Respondent


THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION No.29097 of 2008

ORDER:

The case of the petitioner, precisely, as per the writ affidavit is that he was provisionally selected for the post of Constable (General Duty) in respondent-Central Reserve Police Force, subject to medical fitness and verification of educational documents. It is his case that verification of character and antecedents was not part of the selection process and therefore seeking character and antecedent verification from the District Magistrate, Khammam is arbitrary. Further, basing on the report furnished by District Magistrate, Khammam vide Letter dated 12.05.2004 conveying adverse remarks stating that two criminal cases vide Crime No.36 of 2002 and 37 of 2002 were registered against the petitioner in connection with eve teasing and outraging modesty of a girl, the respondent No.1-Commandant CRPF issued the termination Notice dated 14.12.2004 specifying one month period for termination of service. Thereafter, the Impugned Order dated

06.01.2005 was passed terminating the services of the petitioner.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of In

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top