IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.RADHA RANI, J
APAC Financial Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Jerripthula Yadagiri – Respondent
THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE G.RADHA RANI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.1583 of 2025
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioner/decree holder, aggrieved by the docket order dated 09.08.2024 passed in E.P SR No.1112 of 2024 in A.R.C No.H926858768 by the Principal District Judge, Suryapet for returning the E.P without numbering the same.
2. Heard Sri K.S. Suneel, learned counsel for the petitioner.
3. As the CRP was filed challenging the return of E.P without numbering it, the CRP is disposed of at the stage of admission, without issuing notice to the respondents itself.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner – D.Hr filed a petition under Order 21, Rule 11 seeking to issue attachment order to the respondents – J.Drs. under Order 21, Rule 64, but the trial Court returned the E.P on the ground that the award passed by the Arbitrator who was appointed unilaterally was not executable by placing reliance on the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited., Vs. Narender Kumar Prajapat reported in [2023 SCC OnLine Del 3148], but the said judgment was not applicable to the present case, as the Arbitrator was not appointed unilaterall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.