SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 10060

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P.SREE SUDHA, J
Allam Venkatrjam – Appellant
Versus
Baltha Rajamouli and another – Respondent


THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 484 of 2023

ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order dated 17.03.2021 passed in I.A.No.103 of 2018 in O.S.No.1 of 2016 by the learned Junior Civil Judge, Luxettipet at Luxettipet.

2. Heard both sides. Perused the record.

3. The Suit vide O.S.No.1 of 2016 is filed for declaration of title and recovery of possession by the petitioner/plaintiff against respondents/defendants. During the pendency of the petition, petitioner/plaintiff filed I.A.No.103 of 2018 to appoint and Advocate Commissioner. Respondents reported no counter and the trial Court after hearing both sides, dismissed the application on 17.03.2021. Aggrieved by the said order, petitioner preferred this civil revision petition.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner stated that the appointment of advocate commissioner is to demarcate the land for better adjudication of the dispute. The trial Court ought to have allowed the application at least for the land in Sy.No.153. Petitioner is not a party to the W.P.No.11682 of 2015 and the order of the said writ petition is against the authorities only. The remedy under common law and the writ ju

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top