IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P. SAM KOSHY, N. TUKARAMJI, JJ
Pulipati Raj Kumar – Appellant
Versus
B.V.Satish – Respondent
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.SAM KOSHY AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO.343 OF 2024 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice P.SAM KOSHY Heard Sri Shyam Sunder Murthy, learned counsel for the appellants and Sri S.Nagesh Reddy, learned counsel for the respondent.
2. The present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been filed under Order XXXXIII Rule 1 of C.P.C., assailing the order, dated 16.02.2024 in I.A.No.42 of 2023 in O.S.No.1558 of 2022 on the file of learned XI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Ranga Reddy District at L.B.Nagar.
3. The aforementioned suit was filed by the respondent-plaintiff for specific performance directing the appellants to execute a registered Development Agreement- cum-General Power of Attorney in his favour in terms of Memorandum of Understanding, dated 13.01.2019 for development of suit schedule property. Along with the said suit, an application in I.A.No.42 of 2023 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 of C.P.C., was filed seeking for temporary injunction. Vide impugned order, I.A.No.42 of 2023 was allowed, which led to filing of the present Civil Miscellaneous Appeal by the appellants-defendants.
4. The whole suit revolved around the Me
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.