Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
Not specified, Not specified
Mr. R. Giri Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Mr. V. Rama Krishna Reddy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of bribery case. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments against prosecution. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 3. respondent's arguments supporting prosecution. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 4. court's analysis on money laundering law. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46) |
| 5. dismissal of the petition. (Para 47) |
ORDER
1. The present criminal petition is filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code [hereinafter ‘CrPC’] to quash the prosecution complaint bearing S.C. No. 242 of 2021 in ECIR/HYZO/06/2018 [hereinafter ‘impugned prosecution complaint’] pending on the file of the Metropolitan Sessions Judge – cum – Special Court under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 [hereinafter ‘Special Court’]. The Petitioner also seeks to quash the order dated 09.08.2021 whereby summons were issued to him to appear before the Special Court and also the summons.
2. Heard Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, learned counsel representing Mr. R. Giri Kumar, learned counsel on record for the Petitioner; Mr. B. Narasimha Sarma, the learned Additional Solicit
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
