Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SURENDER, J
Rasula Mukunda Rao – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana through Public Prosecutor, High Court – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details of the accused under ipc. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the admissibility of evidence. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's observations on the reliability of evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final order of conviction and sentencing. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT:
1. The appellant/Accused No.l is questioning the judgment of the trial Court in SC No.229 of 2014 dated 27.01.2020, finding him guilty for the offence under Section 307 of IPC and sentenced to under go Rigorous Imprisonment for a period of ten years, filing the present appeal.
2. The case of the prosecution is that, P.W.1 filed a complaint before the Sub-Inspector of Police, Bejjanki on 26.11.2012 stating that there were disputes regarding landed property with the appellant and the acquitted accused Nos.2 and 3. On the said date, there was an altercation between the deceased, who is the husband of P.W.1 and the appellant. In the evening around 6.00 P.M, the appellant and the acquitted accused Nos.2 and 3 entered into the house of P.W.1 and the appellant beat the deceased with the pestle and acquitted A2 and A3 beat P.W.1 with sticks. Having received injuries, the deceased was shif
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
