Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
G.RADHA RAN, J
B. Appalanarasamma W.o. Late Sri B. Satyanarayana Raju – Appellant
Versus
The Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ petition initiated by the petitioner for defreezing accounts. (Para 1) |
| 2. detailed context of the petitioner's situation and claims regarding her accounts. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. defense arguments from cbi regarding the connection of the petitioner to the financial fraud. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. court's observations considering evidence showing the petitioner’s non-culpability. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court's conclusive ruling allowing the defreezing of the petitioner’s accounts. (Para 11 , 12) |
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking Writ of Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to defreeze the bank account and fixed deposits of the petitioner and savings bank account held in the respondent Nos. 2 to 4/Banks and for consequential directions.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Vinod Kumar Deshpande and the learned Special Public Prosecutor for CBI Sri N. Nagender for the respondent No.1.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner was the mother of Sri B.Ramalinga Raju, Sri B.Suryanarayana Raju and Sri B. Rama Raju. She was aged about 85 years. Her husband was a businessman. She opened an account in the respondent No.4
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
