2022 Supreme(Online)(Tel) 6025
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J, SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ
T. Venkateshwarlu – Appellant
Versus
Telangana State Road Transport Corporation – Respondent
WA/333/2022
THE HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI W.A.No.333 of 2022 JUDGMENT: (Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma)
The present writ appeal is arising out of order dated 28.04.2022, passed by the learned Single Judge, in I.A.No.2 of 2022 in W.P.No.9797 of 2022.
The facts of the case reveal that an Agreement was executed between the appellant/writ petitioner and the respondents on 10.11.2016 for construction of toilets.
The contention of the appellant is that on account of the fact that a tree was in existence at the place where the toilets were to be constructed and NOCs were not issued by the authorities in time, he could not complete the work. A show cause notice was issued to the appellant on 04.09.2021 and thereafter, the Agreement was terminated on 28.12.2021.
The authorities have issued a fresh Notice Inviting Tender (NIT), which gave a cause of action to the present appellant to file the writ petition.
The learned Single Judge has issued notices in the matter and has also observed that confirmation of the tender issued by the respondents therein shall be subject to the result of the writ petition.
This Court has passed an order of status quo on 05.05.2022.
Meaning thereby, the entire process of running and operating the toilets has come to an end.
It has also been pointed out by learned Standing Counsel for the respondents- Telangana State Road Transport Corporation that as per the terms and conditions of the Agreement dated 10.11.2016, executed between the parties, there is a Dispute Resolution Mechanism provided under Article 24 thereof.
Article 24 of the Agreement dated 10.11.2016, reads as under:
“Dispute Resolution:
24.1 All matters, question, disputes, differences and/or claims arising out of and/or concerning and/or in connection and/or in consequences or relating to this Agreement whether or not obligations of either of both parties under this Agreement be subsisting at the time of such dispute and whether or not this Agreement has been terminated or purported to be terminated or completed, shall be referred to Civil Suit. The Award of the Court shall be final and binding on the parties to this Agreement.”
In the light of the aforesaid Dispute Resolution Mechanism, this Court is of the opinion that the order of status quo passed by this Court on 05.05.2022 deserves to be vacated and the same is, accordingly, vacated. The learned Single Judge shall be free to proceed ahead in accordance with law. The learned Single Judge shall make all possible endeavour to decide the writ petition at an early date.
With the aforesaid, the writ appeal stands dismissed. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, stand dismissed.
______________________________ SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, CJ ______________________________ ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI, J Date: 10-06-2022 LUR