IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.LAKSHMAN, P.SREE SUDHA, JJ
Mubeena Gazala Fatima – Appellant
Versus
Mohammed Munawar Sulthan Khan – Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE K. LAKSHMAN AND HON’BLE SMT. JUSTICE P. SREE SUDHA FAMILY COURT APPEAL Nos.163 AND 174 OF 2023 C OMMON JUDGMENT: (Per Hon ’ble Sri Justice K. Lakshman)
Lis involved in both the appeals and the parties are one and the same. Therefore, both the appeals being heard together and decided by way of this common order.
2. Heard Sri Mohd.Azhar, learned counsel for the appellant/wife in FCA No.163 of 2023 and respondent-wife in FCA No.174 of 2023; Mr. T.Bala Mohan Reddy, learned counsel representing Ms. K.Ramya, learned counsel for respondent/husband in FCA No.163 of 2023 and the appellant/husband in FCA No.174 of
2023.
(For sake of convenience, the parties herein are referred to as they are arrayed in FCA No.163 of 2023).
3. FCA No.163 of 2023 is filed by the appellant/wife being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the order dated 01.05.2023 passed in OP No.262 of 2022 by the I Additional Family Court at Hyderabad, insofar as declaring custody of 1st and 2nd children and appointing husband as guardian whereas, FCA No.174 of 2023 is filed by the respondent/husband against the same order.
4. Facts:
i. The marriage of the appellant/wife with the respondent/
husband was performed on 05.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.