ORDER:

Heard the learned Senior Counsel Mr. L. Ravi Chander representing the counsel on record Mrs Srutha Keerthi Mandhata appearing on behalf of the Petitioner and Mr K.Arvind Kumar, the learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of respondents 1 to 4.

2. Petitioner approached the Court seeking prayer as under :

“to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent in Reply No.G/W.148/South/W.A – III, dated 24.04.2023, as contrary to the directions in the judgment of the Division Bench in W.A.No.301 of 2023, dated 10.03.2023 and therefore, set aside the same and consequently, set aside the tender notice Nos.Engg-GTL- South-1379, Engg-GTL-South 1384, Engg-GTL-South- 1382, Engg-GTL-South-1375, Engg-GTL-South-1378, Engg-GTL-South-1381, Engg-GTL-South-1383, Engg- GTL-South-1380, Engg-GTL-South-1376, Engg-GTL- South-1377 – dated 28.04.2023, vide – Guntakal Division :: RU GY Section: for proposed construction of Road Under Bridge (Subway) being illegal, arbitrary, violative and contrary to settled direction in W.A.No.301 of 2023, dated 10.03.2023. PERUSED THE RECORD :

3. The relevant portion of the order dated 18.01.20