SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 2539

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
UJJAL BHUYAN, CJ
Dr. V.D. Rajagopal – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana – Respondent


ORDER:

Heard Dr. Susheel Kumar Gupta, learned counsel representing Ms. Jyothi Eswar Gogineni, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. N.Nagendran, learned Special Public Prosecutor (PP) for Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) representing the respondent.

2. This revision case has been filed under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C) read with Section 401 thereof assailing the order dated 17.10.2022 passed by the learned Principal Special Judge for CBI cases at Hyderabad ((cid:145)CBI Court(cid:146), for short) in Crl.M.P.No.1524 of 2020 in C.C.No.1 of 2012 as well as the consequential order dated 28.10.2022 passed by the CBI Court.

3. Be it stated that by the order dated 17.10.2022, CBI Court has dismissed the petition filed by the petitioner under Section 239 Cr.P.C to discharge him in C.C.No.1 of 2012. On the other hand, by the consequential order dated

28.10.2022, the CBI Court has framed charges against the petitioner under Section 120B read with Section 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 120B, 409, 420, 468 and 471 IPC as well as under Section 13(2) read with Section 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (briefly, (cid:

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top