COMMON ORDER:

Both the civil revision petitions are filed to set aside the order dated 25.01.2018 in I.A.Nos.556 and 558 of 2017 in O.A.No.598 of 2012 respectively on the file of Telangana Endowments Tribunal at Hyderabad (hereinafter referred to as “the Tribunal”).

2. The petitioner is the respondent and the respondents are the applicants. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to as they were arrayed in the O.A.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents. Perused the record.

4. Facts, to the extent necessary, are that the applicants filed the main O.A. to declare the respondent as an encroacher of the O.A. schedule property and to evict the respondent from the schedule property and handover vacant physical possession to the 2nd applicant temple. While so, when the main case was coming up for arguments, the applicants filed applications in I.A.Nos.556 and 558 of 2017 to reopen their evidence and to receive the enlisted documents filed along with the petition by condoning the delay by recalling PW1. The respondent filed counter-affidavit by resisting the said applications on the ground that the said applications are file