SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT FOR STATE OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Syed khadar – Appellant
Versus
The State – Respondent


COMMON ORDER:

All these Criminal Petitions are filed by the respective petitioners under Section - 482 of the Code of the Criminal Procedure, 1973, to quash the proceedings in the respective CrimesiCalendar Cases/Sessions Cases registered for the offences under Sections - 188,269,2'70,272,273,328,336 & 420 read with 34,149,511 ofIPC; Sections - 3 (m), 20 (2),21 (1),21 (2), 22,7 (3) and 7 (5) of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Commerce. Production, Supply and Distribution) Act, 2003 (for short'COTP Act') and Sections - 58 and 59 (i) of the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 (for short 'FSS Act').

2. The nature of allegations in all these off'ences relate to transportation, sale, possession, manufacture, storage, etc. of tobacco products including khaini, zarda, pan masala and other such allegedlvharmfll and banned products.

3.

Heard leamed counsel for the respective parties and learned Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the respondents State, and perused the record.

4. Perusal of the record would reveal that the /rs involved in this batch ofcases had already dealt with by this Court extensively vide commonorderda

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top