ORDER:

During -he pendency of the appeal, the ratter was referred to Lol, Aclalat and the sanne was settled belore the krk Adalat, vide Av ard dated 12.O3.2022.

Accordirr 1ly, the MACMA is disposed ol' in rt:rms of the award passed I y the Lok Adalat. No order as to costs, Pending miscellaneous applications, if an1., ;hall stand closed.

IJd/-T.SRINIVAS DEPTJTY TlEGISTRAR -.1.

//TRUE COPYII '''-

St:CTION OFFICER To

Judge, lI-FTC, W rangal at Jangaon. (with records + Cop! of t..A.Award)

2. One CC to Sri A.: amakrishna Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]

3. One CC to Sri Ct Linga Murthy, Advocate [OPUC]

4. Two CD Copies 5. One Spare Copy Kj HIGH COURT DATED:2110612022 =$

(F, of MACMA.No.3456 1019 \ l!0 ;/ 1 / // /

\"t; \/

1 r;

\i-i---1:,- j r1 DISPOSING OF THI MACMA IN TERMS OF L.A. AWARD WITHOUT COSTS.

;, a \ , BEFORE THE LOK ADALAT {r . HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COM/iAITTEE FORTHE STATE OF TELANGANA, HYDERABAD.

[Under Seclion l9 ofithe legol Services Authorities Act, 1987 (Cenkol Acl)l Date: 12-03-2022 Present: l. Hon'ble Justice G, Sri Devi lcEs Chairman

2. Sri K.Venkatesh Gupta, Advocate, 1 Membe.

q t 3. Smt.P.S.Manjula Kumar, Advocate, I o Member lvtACA{A. No.3456 of 2019 :+ (Before the Hon'ble High Court)

aor$e AGAINST M.V.O.P.No.280 of 2017 i I (0n the fite of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Ctaims Tribunal Cum - V;Additionat District Judge :: ll-FTC, Warangat at Jangaon)

Between:-

Shriram General lnsurancd Co.Ltd., Represented by its Branch Manager, Jaipur, Rajasthan State.

...AppetlanvRespondent No.3 AND

1. Marimuthu Roopika, D/o Marimuthu Setva Kumar, aged 3 years (Minor)

Represented by her Next Friend and Paternat Grandmother Maiimuthu Vasantha i.e- Respondent No.2

2- Marimuthu Vasantha W/o Marimuthu Age: 54 years, occ: Household

3. Marimuthu, S/o Ramaswamy, Age: 57 yea6, Occ: Nit Att are R/o H.No.2-90, Gangapuram Vittage, Gundata Mandat, Jangaon District, Now at Jangaon.

...Respondent Nos.l to 3/Petitioners

4. Ravi Kumar, 5/o. Karthar singh, Age: 27 years, Occ: Driveri R7o Piparaj vittage, Morena District, t{adhya Pradesh state.

5. Rajveer Singh Gurjar, S/o.rSH Babu Singh, Age: 40 years, Occ: Business, R/o Papiraj Ka Pura, Hetampur, Morena District, Madhya Pradesh ...Respondent Nos.4 & s/Respondent Nos.l & 2 :

Counset for Appetlant/ Re;pondent No.3 Sri A.Ramakrishna Reddy, Advocate lnsurance Company Counsel for Respondents /Petitioners : Sri Ch.Linga Murthy, Advocate This appeal having been referred for setttement before this Lok Adatat and after hearing the Learned Counsel for the parties and atso the parties, the fottowing award is passed:

I \

)."t<.e-

AWARD I 'I Compensation Avr'arded by the Rs.19,32,000/- (Rupees Nineteer takhs thirtv Lower Court. two thousand onty) with proportrolate cc,sts and sp.$

interest @ 9% per annum from tt e date of the fiting of the petition titt the date ( f reatization.

Compensation Awardcd The lnsurance company has alr€ady deposited (SettLement Reached) 50% of the amount awarded by the Tribunal. in the Lok Adatat. Now the Ctaimants are agre rd to forego fu-1,50,000/- from the total av'arded amount \

together with interest amount co;ts. ln addition I to the deposited and fore!oing emount, I IC€S Rs- 1 2,43,000/- (Rupees Twetve 1.. khs forty-three thousand onty) to be paid/det,osited by the o t lnsurance Company towards ult and finat setttement, within one month ir)m the date of I o\ receipt of the copy of Award. n the ?vent of lhe I default or delay in maklng su(h deposit, tlre l amount payabte shall carry inte cst at 12% per annum from the date of defautt.

Apportionment of Compensal )n, lf any On such deposit, the Respond rlls/Potitioners I Ctaimants No.'l to 3 are entitted their rcsnective shares as per thF apportionmer t madc by the I I iounat. I I I Additional Direction(s):

1. The Appetl,ant is (, titted to the refund of Court Fee paid in this appeal.

2. The Respondents, )etitioners/Claimants No.2 and 3 ari: permitted to withdraw their respective s rres.

3. The share of the ninor Respondent/PetitionerfCtalmlnt No.1 shal.t te kept in f