ORDER:

Heard he submission of the learned cou:rsel lor the petitioners :r ; r,r,ell as the learned counsel app,::ar.Lng for respondent

2. Challer: ge in this revision petition is the orcler that is renderecl by the Court of III Additional Dist:ir:t Judge, Karimnagar n I.A.No.486 of 2022 in O.S No. 121,1 ,ri 2013 dated07 09.. O22

3. The r,: vision petitioners who are th e del'end zmts to the suit mo' ed an application under Section r 51 CPC, seeking the (. ourt to permit them to file arlditional rvritten statement. iuch request was dishonorecl anc -herefore, the revision etitioners are belore this Court.

1.

4 karn,, d counsel for the revision p etit.ioners contends th:r , the petitioners were not arvane ol tLLe fact that the re-" rondent plaintiff sought for arnenrlnrent of plaint and gc; plaint amended and after tht:y cann,,: tc know that the plair: was amended, they moved ar-l applir:ation for

2 DT CSL, J CRP.No.2l54 of2022 filing additional written statement but the Court did not permit the petitioners to file additional written statement. Learned counsel submits that in case such permission is accorded, the revision petitioners would put forth their case through the additional written