SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(TEL) 23968

HIGH COURT OF TELANGANA
K. LAKSHMAN, J
Gandla Rajamouli – Appellant
Versus
Gandla Ramulu – Respondent


ORDER: 

Heard Mr. A. Krupadhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioners. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the respondent.

2. This Civil Revision Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the order dated 08.08.2024 passed in I.A.No.298 of 2024 in O.S.No.103 of 2018 by learned Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Karimnagr.

3. The respondent herein - plaintiff filed a suit vide O.S.No.103 of 2018 before the learned Principal Junior Civil Judge at Karimnagar against the petitioners herein - defendants, seeking a) to declare the suit passage as exclusive way to reach his house, b) to grant perpetual injunction retraining the petitioners herein from making any construction obstructing free access to his house, c) to grant mandatory injunction directing the petitioners herein to remove the trenches dug in the suit passage and d) to award costs.

4. In the said suit, the respondent herein filed an application vide I.A.No.208 of 2024 under Section 151 CPC, to permit his wife Smt. Gandla Suvarna to depose as P.W.1 on his behalf.

5. The wife of the respondent herein in her affidavit stated that her husband i.e. respondent herein i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top