ORDER:

This Civil Revision Petition is filed by the petitioners aggrieved by the order dated 18.07.2024 passed in I.A. No.873 of 2024 in HMOP No.89 of 2024 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Sanga Reddy.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that both the petitioners filed a petition under Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (for short ‘HM Act’) for dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent and filed I.A. No.873 of 2024 under Section 13B (2) of the HM Act to waive off the cooling period of six months. But, the said application was dismissed by the trial court observing that no urgency was made out, six months mandatory period as prescribed under Section 13B (2) of the HM Act was not yet completed and no cogent reasons were brought on record. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioners preferred this revision petition.

4. He further submitted that the marriage between the petitioner No.1 and petitioner No.2 was solemnized on 04.06.2021 as per Hindu rites and customs at Suryadevara Gardens, Mallampet road, near Bachupally, Sanga Reddy. It was an arranged marriage and the marriage was consummated. After the marriage, the petitioners found out that their views and ideas were not suitable to each other and they developed a dislike against each other. The marriage tie between the petitioners was broken down irretrievably and since 18.01.2022 they were living separately. The elders of both the petitioners tried to settle the differences but they could not succeed due to which the petitioners were living separately at their respective places. Having mutually and amicably settled all the disputes among themselves, both the parties entered into a Memorandum of Understanding and out of their own will, volition and clear mind, the petitioners mutually decided to seek a decree of dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent and filed the petition to waive off the mandatory statutory period. But, the same was dismissed by the trial court without considering that the petitioners were living separately for the past two years and even after involvement of the elders and their parents, they were unable to live together. Therefore, no amount of cooling period would bring the petitioners back together. There was no scope of reconciliation. They were living separately since 18.01.2022. The petitioners were unable to focus on their careers and move on in their lives. They were suffering psychologically and physically. The said issues had impacted their health and were putting their career, life and all their years of hard work at stake. It was causing extreme hardship to the petitioners to stay in the matrimonial tie together. Asking them to stay together for another year was not prudent, but the trial court had not considered the said aspect. The learned counsel relied upon the judgment of the Hon’ble Apex Court in Amit Kumar v. Suman Beniwal1, wherein certain factors were given to exercise the discretion for waiving off the cooling period.

5. Perused the record.

6. As seen from the record, the marriage between the petitioners was admittedly solemnized on 04.06.2021 and they stated that they were living separately since 18.01.2022 and filed the OP for dissolution of their marriage on 28.06.2024 along with I.A. No.873 of 2024 to waive off the cooling period of six months. The record also would disclose that the petitioner No.2 was a resident of California, USA and was represented by his father as his GPA holder.

7. Section 13B of the Hindu Marriage Act,1955, reads as under:

“13B. Divorce by mutual consent. —

(1)Subject to the provisions of this Act a petition for dissolution of marriage by a decree of divorce may be presented to the district court by both the parties to a

1 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1270

marriage together, whether such marriage was solemnized before or after the commencement of the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976 (68 of 1976), on the ground that they have been living se